How to Destroy America...

How I sometimes long to have a gift to speak like this man did 10 years ago...I am not anti immigration, my mother is an English citizen to this day, who married my father after they met while he was serving our country in France. My mother carries her green card and is more loyal to this country than many of our "leaders" in DC.

IF you don't believe this can happen to America, I suggest you look at recent English history with the multiculturalism and tolerance in a country where now you must be cautious in case your speech is "to English". We, as a country are quickly headed down the same path...Every thing our found fathers fought and died for, is being taken away piece by piece.

May Father God cause a revival in the hearts of Americans to take our country back!

This took place about 10 years ago (I don't have a date).

Look at what has happened since he spoke these words ! ! ! !

We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado .. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was antimmigration overpopulation conference in Washington , DC , filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Davis Hanson talked about his latest book, 'Mexifornia,' explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California . He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America.

The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States . He said, 'If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America . It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all greatcivilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.''

'Here is how they do it,' Lamm said:

'First, to destroy America , turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country... History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way:'The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada ,Belgium , Malaysia , and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy , if not independence. Pakistanand Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, Corsicans and Muslims.'

Lamm went on: 'Second, to destroy America , invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal; that there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

'Third, we could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec 'without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricy and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.' Lamm said, 'I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities.'

'Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated,undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school.'

My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of'Victimology...' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.'

My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precept. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games.. A common enemy, Persia , threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. 'E. Pluribus Unum' -- From many, one.In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus'instead of the 'Unum,' we will 'Balkanize' America as surely as Kosovo.'

'Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits. Make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe'halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra:That because immigration has been good for America , it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them.'

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow.Profound silence followed. Finally he said, 'Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson's book 'Mexifornia.' His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America .. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book.'

There was no applause.

A chilling fear quietly rose like anominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the ThirdWorld as corporations create a Third World in America. Take note of California and other states. To date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book '1984..' In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building:'War is peace,' 'Freedom is slavery,' and 'Ignorance is strength..'

Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.

With a Stroke of his pen.

With a stroke of his pen, BO has today ended true freedom of the United States. The politians have taken so much with this bill, and dissolved the American Dream.

With a stroke of his pen, he has again broken his oath of office to defend the American Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic

With a stroke of his pen, he has become the enemy of the United States, he has undone what our founding fathers started.

With a stroke of his pen, I can no longer encourage my grandchildren to go to college, with his student loan takeover/power grab, I am sure the cost of college will be unattainable without student loans, to which there will be a catch.

With a stroke of his pen, he has cause us to have to pay for the death of the unborn.

With a stroke of his pen, he has caused the death of seniors with rationing of healthcare.


With a stroke of his pen, any household with children can (and will) be subject to "home inspections" for the welfare of the chilren, "they" will determine how the children will be raised.

With a stroke of his pen, he has signed away the future of our children and our grandchildren.

With a stroke of his pen....the death of a republic.


Pelosi said we would have to pass it to see what was in it, unfortunatley, some of us took time to read a lot of it, and know what is in it.




No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope that it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen, if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve.

This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?

For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth -- to know the worst and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House?

Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation -- the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motives for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies?

No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer on the subject? Nothing.

We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves longer.

Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament.

Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope.

If we wish to be free -- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending -- if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak -- unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?

Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable -- and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!

Patrick Henry - March 23, 1775

So you think you want Nationalized Health Care

Since the president Elect and his cronies seem to be advocates and desire to impliment change in our health care system, they need to look at those already in place.


Starved to death in an NHS hospital: Damning inquiry highlights case of patient left without food for 26 days
This story is of a man who at 43 years of age had a stroke. He also had downs syndrome. He had a naso gastric tube for feeding...but the nurses did not feed him because the dr. had not written a note to have the man fed!

Reference in the article:

Emma Kemp, 26, was denied cancer treatment that could have saved her life, while 30-year-old Mark Cannon died two months after being admitted to hospital with a broken leg. Both of these people were "challenged" and had problems speaking, the gentleman with the broken leg died of septicemia...after being discharged.

Then this story:

How about the new mother-to-be showing up in labor and needed an emergency c section. The baby was breach and in distress. The hospital could not perform a c section because to save nomey, there was no ansthesiologist on duty "after hours". The baby died.

What about the call recorded from an amublance service. A gentleman called for emergency help, left his phone off the hook. The EMT's did not realize this and made no effort to save the patient, instead commenting on his house and saying it was not worth saving this man. The man died.

Two young mothers have died of pneumonia since Christmas after being told by medical staff that they had nothing worse than a bout of flu or a virus.


My cousins wife went in to the ER in November, they have diagnosed her with gallstones, tenetatively, she is STILL waiting for a dr appt with her regular doctor to be treated for this....and as far as being "free", my cousin is taxed about 500/month for NHS alone!

A friend of my mothers needs surgery on her lungs, NHS will not due it because she has a history of smoking....she quit smoking 25 years ago!

No, these stories are not made up...In 1980, my father was stationed in England (I am a very proud product of a career serviceman and his beloved wife, support and friend) Because my mother is English and we spent time over there, I qualified for NHS as a child. I was living with my grandparents in Bedford and working. On the way home for lunch, I was hit by a car and rushed to the hospital. I spent 2 days in hospital before seeing a dr. There was no room in the orthopedic ward so I was in an open ward in geriatrics. After x-rays etc, I was casted and sent on my way. Now I have terrible pain in my knee, I needed then and still need surgery on my knee that should have been performed at the time of the hospitalization, but the dr was incompetent.

How about the young man with cancer who was denied life saving treatment because the cost was to expensive, and he was told that if he paid for it himself, he would be removed from NHS.

In the Bedford hospital, the community had fund raisers to purchase an MRI machine, the hospital now is limited to when they can use it because they rent it out to doctors who have "private" patients thus restricting the use of it by the very people who raised the money to purchase it.


Do not think for a moment that these stories are rare, those that can afford it over there now by private insurance, the cost's are more than we can even imagine. The NHS rations care according to illness, medical history and age.

My father had to go to the "local" va hospital which is about 2 1/2 hours away from us. The conditions were appalling, a government run hospital. The national news has uncovered horror stories about the VA hospitals and the conditions in which our military heroes are treated, and this is what the idiots in office want to do for us? NO THANKS.